Matt Burgess wrote: > Obviously, this is all pretty > academic for me; if I'd have been using or otherwise needing the by-path > symlinks, I would have noticed their disappearance in udev-182. The > only reason I noticed they were missing now is because of xinglp's > report. Whilst I can understand the use cases for by-uuid and by-label, > I can't immediately think of a use for by-path, and as no one else in > LFS-land has reported this before then I guess we can just chalk this > one up as a curiosity for now :-)
That's my thought too. It would be a 'nice to have' from a consistency point of view, but I don't see a need that applications depend on. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
