On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 11:03:50PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > >>> I don't follow systemd, no doubt some of the changes are important > >>> for the project, but without monitoring it I can't guess which, if > >>> any, impact the udev part. I'm still hoping that standalone udev > >>> will gain traction. > >> > >> That would require a major attitude change from the developers. IMO > >> they have a vested emotional interest in not separating udev. > >> > > I meant the fork created by gentoo users. I'm encouraged to see > > that they seem to be picking up the useful things from "upstream". > > I read through the thread on the development. Most of it seems to be > about the ebuild stuff. I think our method of a custom Makefile for the > systemd sources is easier than what they are doing. > > I do agree with the general sentiments about systemd though. > > There was one interesting post where the person was amazed by the boot > time without an initrd. :)
Comments in lists and forums can be interesting, but code counts. I took a look at their git log the other day and was very encouraged by it. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
