On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 05:24:42PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > It would now appear there is an error in the sunrpc portion of the > Makefile that is calling the wrong gcc. I guess it didn't fail for me > because I did install libtirpc for testing samba. > I surmise that Jasmine failed to install the rpc headers, which we do in chapter 6. But, that has highlighted the issue for those of us who did install them.
> I don't know if changing the gcc to x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc would be > sufficient or not, but I think we need to do that as a minimum. > Your reply came in while I was composing my follow-up. I refer you back to my initial posting where I pointed to a post on libc-alpha - glibc-2.16.0 appears to have been changed so that it will install some rpc stuff even if cross-compiling, so from upstream's POV it iis using the _right_ gcc. My current theory is that overriding the compiler *and* using the internal headers in chapter 5 glibs will suffice, but I'll use --enable-obsolete-rpc headers in chapter 6. I'm doing a fresh build, it's just got to ch5 glibc. > -- Bruce > > Note: > > `-MF FILE' > When used with the driver options `-MD' or `-MMD', `-MF' overrides > the default dependency output file. > > `-MP' > This option instructs CPP to add a phony target for each dependency > other than the main file, causing each to depend on nothing. These > dummy rules work around errors `make' gives if you remove header > files without updating the `Makefile' to match. > > `-MMD' > Like `-MD' except mention only user header files, not system > header files. > > `-MT TARGET' An `-MT' option will set the target to be exactly the > string you specify. Heh, I'll leave these options to you, I'm too stupid to get htem right :) ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
