On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:47:33 +0100, Andrew Benton <a...@benton.eu.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 22:55:42 +0100
> Matt Burgess <matt...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 18:20 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
>>
>> > (We won't hit the libgcc_s.so problem with Gcc until we start using
>> > Gcc-4.7.2)
>>
>> Hi Andy, I've finally gotten around to looking at this.  You mention we
>> won't start hitting this until we start using GCC-4.7.2, but I saw it
>> tonight using 4.7.1, as did you by the looks of the first line in your
>> log output above?  Is there another issue you're anticipating when 4.7.2
>> is released?
> 
> Yes, I talked about the Gcc problem here:
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2012-June/066726.html
> The second pass of Gcc 4.7.2 won't compile without libgcc_s.so
> installed, so I have to (in gcc-build, just before running make):

Right, gotcha.  There's a patch at
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-05/msg01920.html that removes
the dependency on libgcc_s.  Whether or not we will need that will depend
on whether or not the next version of GCC is released before Glibc!

Regards,

Matt.

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to