Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > I thought popt was already removed from pkg-config in git? If so, why > did we add it into the book now instead of at least applying Dan's patch > to remove that dependency?
Other packages use popt. If it works (appears to be ok) and can be used by pkg-config, then we might as well do it. At least that's my conclusion. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
