Andrew Benton wrote: > It seems to me that we should remove udev from LFS and point anyone > who needs it at the systemd page in BLFS. They've shown that they're > integrating udev more tightly with systemd, we should move away from > it.
Let's see what they say when I post the configure.ac / Makefile.am patch that I'm about to test out the effects of, using the .tar.xz archive that Bruce posted a couple days ago. Because I might just be overoptimistic, but given the success I had with sys/capability.h and dbus, I bet we can instead just upgrade to udev-185 (once it's released), and pass --disable-systemd or --enable-udev-only or whatever the option ends up being called. Looks like a couple "make install" overrides will be needed too, to avoid creating some directories, but that's not a huge deal either. (But I do have to test this on an actual chapter-6 setup before sending the patch. And the patch as-is won't work well for chapter 6; we'd have to change it to also modify configure and Makefile.in.)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
