On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 05:33 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Jeremy Huntwork > <jhuntw...@lightcubesolutions.com> wrote: > > On 5/28/12 2:52 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> The problem is that none of these libraries are used for udev. On a > >> recent blfs system, where the systemd dependent libraries are installed, > >> I as able to build and looked at the executables and libraries. AFAIK, > >> the only ones are /bin/udevadm, /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-udevd, > >> /lib/libudev.so.1.0.0 and /usr/lib/udev/*. > > > > Perhaps the best solution is to complain loudly to upstream and hope > > that enough do so that they build into the package the ability to build > > and install only the udev components as they said would be possible. > > Have any of you guys considered actually making patches and sending > them upstream? The autotools are not that scary. Having been both > upstream and downstream, my guess is that those guys will accept > patches that allow a udev-only build, but they just don't have any > interest in doing that work themselves. I'm sure there are more than a > few people around who are interested in that scenario (they're already > showing up on the hotplug list) who would test and push for the > patches. If it's that critical to keep systemd out of LFS, then you'd > probably be best served by taking control of the situation. IMO. > > Here's an untested patch to get you started.
Thanks Dan. I'd much prefer to see a patch that is likely to be accepted upstream too. I'll see if I can test your patch out soon. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
