I've been able to build udevadm, udevd, and accelerometer in the new distribution. I had to build each file separately and come up with the link scripts, but none of the spurious packages are needed. I'll check the other libexec programs tomorrow.
Optimally we need to get upstream to split their libraries so that the files that don't need all the extra packages are in a separate directory. These are the files needed: src/libudev/libudev-list.o src/libudev/libudev-queue-private.o src/libudev/libudev-util.o src/libudev/libudev-monitor.o src/libudev/libudev.o src/libudev/libudev-device.o src/libudev/libudev-device-private.o src/libudev/libudev-queue.o src/libudev/libudev-enumerate.o src/shared/util.o src/shared/log.o src/shared/dev-setup.o src/shared/label.o src/shared/cgroup-util.o src/shared/strv.o src/shared/path-util.o src/shared/hashmap.o src/shared/set.o src/shared/conf-files.o src/shared/exit-status.o src/shared/mkdir.o src/login/sd-login.o src/libsystemd-daemon/sd-daemon.o The script I built to compile and link the programs is fairly long (and ugly to my taste), but also pretty straight forward. I haven't tested the programs yet, but the build is clean. If we have to, we can create a 'patch' to add the script to the source and create the executables with that. I wouldn't bother trying to create libraries for LFS. I don't know of anything that would want to link against them except the current udev files. Each executable is about 200K so the overhead isn't too bad. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
