On May 18, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On 5/18/12 5:22 AM, Qrux wrote:
>> But, let's not make it a crime to clarify. If Ken would rather assert
>> that I'm not "new" to the community, then to the extent that his
>> assertion is valid I'd say that I see a lot of GroupThink(TM) in LFS.
>> Most is probably good. But there are often ruffled feathers when
>> long-held assumptions from time immemorial are questioned. I figure
>> decisions about LFS aren't usually proofs. It stands to reason, then
>> that those decisions can be questioned.
>
> I could be wrong, but I think what is happening is that the length and
> style of your emails reads as a bit aggressive and ends up being a
> little off-putting.
Quite fair. I'll work on it.
I do appreciate all the responses, and I think my question has been
answered on the kbd/resizecons issue.
I'll let you and Bruce continue on about experimentation, etc. I would
ordinarily chime in (and suggest probably more flame-worthy stuff like
moving to git would foster more experimentation, because the effort of
merging would be front-loaded on forkers--not trunk maintainers) but
I'll take a break for a bit, and wait until this episode cools off.
Q
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
