Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em sex, 6/4/12, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
>
>> De: Bruce Dubbs Assunto: Re: [lfs-dev] Automake-1.11.4 Para: "LFS
>> Developers Mailinglist" Data: Sexta-feira, 6 de Abril de 2012,
>> 19:08 Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> aclocal-1.11.4 and automake-1.11.4 could not been
>> found:
>>> $ automake --version | grep automake && ls -l
>> /usr/bin/{aclocal,automake}*
>>> automake (GNU automake) 1.11.4 -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 31104 Abr
>>> 5 13:13
>> /usr/bin/aclocal
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 31104 Abr 5 13:13
>> /usr/bin/aclocal-1.11
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 259967 Abr 5 13:13
>> /usr/bin/automake
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 259967 Abr 5 13:13
>> /usr/bin/automake-1.11
>>
>> Fernando, Can you expand on this a bit. What are you doing that
>> makes this a problem? I have the same thing in a slightly older
>> version (1.11.1) and do not recall any problems with it.
>>
>> -- Bruce
>
>
> Thanks for the message, Bruce.
>
> No problem, here.
>
> Just noticed that in "Contents of Automake" and "Short Descriptions",
> we have "aclocal-1.11.4" and "automake-1.11.4" (micro-versioned?),
> but in /usr/bin, only "aclocal-1.11" and "automake-1.11"
> (minor-versioned?).
It looks like a minor problem in our Contents. We use the entity
&automake-version; where we probably need to define am-minor-version and
use that.
I just did that in my working copy and it will be a part of my next commit.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
