在 2012年4月5日 下午4:34，Matthew Burgess <matt...@linuxfromscratch.org> 写道：
> That's because we (LFS) dropped the uname patch from
> our build instructions because upstream won't take
> it in its current form. If my understanding is
> correct, the correct way of implementing this feature
> is by a combination of changes in the kernel & Glibc.
>
> I don't have the skill necessary to do that, and
> by virtue of the fact that these uname patches have
> been floating around for so many years, nobody with
> the skill has the inclination to fix this.
>
> Is this causing you any issues other than purely
> cosmetic ones?
a few of my bash scripts depend on "uname -i" or "uname -p", I think
I'd better change them to use "uname -m".
>
> Regards,
>
> Matt.
>
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
