On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:29:29 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > Greg, there's no need to make this personal.
No worries dude. Not trying to cause trouble so my apologies if you've taken any offence. I just tend to get passionate about build method matters. > It was mostly reading those (and bits of the source) as well > as the tests/experimentation that convinced me that the proposed method > is solid. OK. I'm about to go off line for a little while so realistically it'll be months before I'm fully up-to-speed and able to test and analyse changes with authority. I still reckon the proposed changes are: - ugly - unnecessary - overcomplicate the build even more than it already is - reduce overall educational value But if you firmly believe they are solid and you are willing to support through thick and thin and actually document the logic competently, go for it. Catch up with you soon. Regards Greg -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
