On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 02:04:09PM +0000, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:29:10 +0000 > Ken Moffat <zarniwh...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 09:49:43AM +0000, Andrew Benton wrote: > > > Sorry, I didn't mean to cause offence. > > > > Me neither, but I fear my first post was upsetting to *you*. > > Sorry. > > I think BLFS is a lot better now than it was 6 months ago and I'm proud > of that. When you said "slash and burn" it seemed you were > characterising the work we do as quite crude. > > Andy
You have every right to be proud of the improvements you've made. I had intended only to describe the en-masse removal of packages which had not been rendered for donkeys years, but left around clogging the arteries, or at least clogging the results of 'grep'. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
