On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:49:07 -0500, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > The main differences (I'll outline all of them shortly) are the > pre-adjusting of gcc in pass 1 along with the use of sysroot and newlib.
I'm so far out of touch I don't have the energy to shoot this down. For the record, I don't agree with the changes. Seems to include a lot of the elements I argued strongly against some years ago. IMHO sysroot is fine for real cross compilation sysroot not fine for hybrid cross/native scenarios a'la current LFS There seems to be a lot of additional hacks required to prevent stuff being found on the host (check the diff). BTW, you might want to check your facts re the newlib switch. This sentence is clearly wrong: "This enables a very small standard C library that is included with GCC." Good luck Greg -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
