Jeremy Huntwork wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I guess the only thing we should do is change the last sentence in
>> section 6.63 to:
>>
>> Do not use this option on static (.a) libraries—they will be destroyed.
>
>
> Maybe recommend using --strip-unneeded instead since that
> intelligently does the right thing for both types of libs.
So you recommend instead:
"If disk space is very tight, the --strip-unneeded option can be used on
the binaries and libraries in /{lib,sbin,bin,usr/{bin,sbin,lib}} to gain
several more megabytes."
Is that right?
That makes me a little nervous. I think I might be more in favor of
just dropping the last paragraph. At the end of Chapter 6, a few MB
should just not be significant. You get a lot more space by removing
/tools as described in section 6.64, 488M in my case.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
