On Sep 3, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote:

> On Sep 3, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I think the change is to the internal pkg-config version of popt.  If an 
>> external version of popt is used, then the change to the test may not be 
>> needed.
> 
> It's changing the test-suite, the script that checks pkg-config's usage of 
> popt, not the internal popt itself. The test case should pass regardless of 
> whether pkg-config is linked against a system popt or the internal one. I 
> think it may point to a flawed popt shipped with pkg-config, or a flawed 
> compilation of it.

Re-reading your comment, Bruce, I think maybe I misunderstood what you were 
trying to say. If that's the case, my apologies, please disregard my comments 
above. Anyway, I'm sure you'll figure out how you want to handle this issue.

Regards,

JH
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to