On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 11:40:18 -0500 Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote: > > Hello World! > > I've been following an interesting thread here: > > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-from-scratch-13/segfault-in-ld-2-14-so-running-alsa-utils-893812/ > > about alsa-utils' aplay and speaker-test segfaulting with glibc-2.14. > > It looks like a bug in glibc so I wondered if it was fixed in current > > glibc git head. So I've just tried to build with current glibc and > > configure fails during the first pass in chapter 5 like this: > > > > checking for .protected and .hidden assembler directive... yes > > checking whether __attribute__((visibility())) is supported... yes > > checking for broken __attribute__((visibility()))... no > > checking for broken __attribute__((alias()))... no > > checking whether to put _rtld_local into .sdata section... no > > checking for .preinit_array/.init_array/.fini_array support... yes > > checking whether to use .ctors/.dtors header and trailer... configure: > > error: missing __attribute__ ((constructor)) support?? > > lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources$ > > > > It looks like current glibc doesn't like the gcc we compile during the > > first pass in chapter 5. I can configure and build glibc with the gcc > > on my current system so I suspect that this is because the gcc we > > compile during the first pass in chapter 5 is a cross compiler and does > > not have this __attribute__ ((constructor)). Does anyone know any more > > about this or how to work around it? > > What happens if you try to build glibc after gcc pass 2? > I don't know, I can't recompile gcc because I can't compile glibc. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
