Gilles Espinasse wrote: > Changelog say one patch was applied but patch is not there. > > --- psmisc-22.13/ChangeLog 2010-07-14 10:11:16.000000000 +0200 > +++ psmisc-22.14/ChangeLog 2011-06-20 13:37:23.000000000 +0200 > @@ -1,3 +1,25 @@ > +Changes in 22.14 > ... > + * fuser -m -s flags work - Patch by jgorig SF#31110178 RH#651794 > > > In fact, patch was really applied only after 22.14 > > http://psmisc.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=psmisc/psmisc;a=commitdiff;h=06c3bb5ca810e6262c39ea476e2dfa80aa788b20 > > Unsure if LFS want that. This is not critical. > Should I open a ticket or not?
I really think not. We don't want to chase every bug fix that is made upstream. If they think it's critical, they'll make another release. My reasoning for using a patch is when it directly affects building or operation of an LFS program. In this case, fuser has a memory leak. Since that program just provides output and exits, it's not a big deal. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
