On 06/28/2010 11:10 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 06/28/2010 10:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> We probably need to also mention: > >> # Note: If you use PAM, it is recommended to use a value consistent with >> # the PAM modules configuration. > >> Other opinions? > >> -- Bruce > > > Despite the comment in login.defs, that is not necessary. In fact, PAM > also adds support for bigcrypt (DEC C2) and blowfish encryption in the > shadow file (as long as crypt() supports them).
OT: Just for good measure: http://pasky.or.cz/~pasky/dev/glibc/crypt_blowfish-1.0-suse.diff -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
