Hello, Just a quick word to say that this problem is solved with the following soft (hard to find via Google because the old soft (dtk-manager) is still referenced as stable on the Linux Foundation website ) :
http://ispras.linuxfoundation.org/index.php/About_Distribution_Checker I'm currently trying to pass the LSB certification with my freshly built LFS 6.6. Best regards, François -----Message d'origine----- De : Bruce Dubbs [mailto:bruce.du...@gmail.com] Envoyé : jeudi 17 juin 2010 00:12 À : Borie François Objet : Re: TR: [ LFS 6.6 ] Question about LSB compliancy Borie François wrote: > Hello Bruce, > > Firstly, please forgive me for my mistakes in English ;-) > > I'm working in a company which is using LFS as its main linux > distribution. Concerning that point, I really want to congratulate > you and the LFS team for the really good job you're doing with that > project. That's such an interesting and exciting work, helping people > to understand how is Linux working inside... > > I've just compiled the last LFS 6.6 and I'm currently trying to pass > the LSB certification tests with the toolkit provided by the linux > foundation. Our goal is to get certified. > > I'm facing the same problem that you've reported to the LSB mailling > list : > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/2009-September/006178.html > > > [10:05:27] Subshell output stalled for 11 minutes, 0 seconds > [10:05:27] Subshell stalled for too long, terminating. [10:05:27] > Subshell closed [10:05:27] error: There were errors during the > working with the subshell [10:05] core test has returned code 127 > > My question is : did you manage to solve this issue ? If yes, how ? > > I succeed in launching some individual lsb tests, like cmdchk and > libchk. But the main "core" lsb test systematically failed, without > explicit errors. I did not solve the problem and I didn't really get good help from the LSB mailing list. I do believe they have a newer version of the tests, but I've not tried that. I'm sorry I can't help more, but if you do get any further, I'd appreciate it if you could send a note to lfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org. -- Bruce Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et réservés à l'usage exclusif de ses destinataires. Il peut également être protégé par le secret professionnel. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci d'en avertir immédiatement l'expéditeur et de le détruire. L'intégrité du message ne pouvant être assurée sur Internet, la responsabilité du groupe Atos Origin ne pourra être recherchée quant au contenu de ce message. Bien que les meilleurs efforts soient faits pour maintenir cette transmission exempte de tout virus, l'expéditeur ne donne aucune garantie à cet égard et sa responsabilité ne saurait être recherchée pour tout dommage résultant d'un virus transmis. This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
