On Friday May 28 2010 04:46:13 pm Gilles Espinasse wrote:
> Looking at the difference between diffutils-2.9/3.0 compilation log, I find
> this
>
> grep re_compile_pattern ./*
> ./coreutils-8.5:checking for working re_compile_pattern... yes
> ./diffutils-2.9:checking for working re_compile_pattern... no
> ./diffutils-3.0:checking for working re_compile_pattern... yes
> ./findutils-4.4.2:checking for working re_compile_pattern... yes
> ./findutils-4.4.2:checking for working re_compile_pattern... (cached) yes
> ./gettext-0.17:checking for working re_compile_pattern... no
> ./grep-2.6.3:checking for working re_compile_pattern... yes
> ./m4-1.4.14:checking for working re_compile_pattern... no
> ./sed-4.2.1:checking for working re_compile_pattern... yes
> ./tar-1.23:checking for working re_compile_pattern... no
>
> More recent and older look to find yes and use glibc version when
> midle-aged answer no and use gnulib flavor.
>
> That's a gnulib change
> http://old.nabble.com/-PATCH--ensure-that-the-regexp--b-a--is-diagnosed-as-
>invalid-td27438813.html
>
> Gilles

Try --without-included-regex to use Glibc's regex library.

robert

Attachment: pgpqD6QolpC3Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to