Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Somebody from SuSE seems to have commented. *crossing fingers*...
Yes, it seems fairly problematic. > It seems fairly obvious from comparing 32-bit and 64-bit glibc what's wrong > with the constants being used, as long as someone actually does that. > > (I'm just hoping it doesn't get closed as a duplicate of bug 333: "build > failures aren't to be reported here".) The latest comment is: Fixed in git. Good job. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
