Greg Schafer wrote: > Ryan Oliver wrote: > >> # Sysroot based SANE multilib cross-compiler build for LFS style builds > > Heh, this is hilarious. A new and improved build method goes into LFS and > CLFS folks awake from the dead :-) Feeling some pressure guys? :-) > > Sorry mate, but this whole thing looks of very poor quality and not at > all suitable for a mainstream LFS build method. It looks like same old > CLFS bodged up to imitate DIY/LFS! But the worst part is it comes complete > with all the CLFS design flaws, crazy hackery, silly patches and > unnecessary configure switches! Sorry dude, but if you're going to bob > up here with attitude and put up shite on this list then I'm going to > criticize it. > > And dude, it doesn't make it any saner the more times you write the word > `sane' in caps. It's like you're trying to bamboozle everyone with how > many toolchain buzzwords you can throw around. You might be able to > impress your IRC wannabe cronies with this caper but you ain't fooling me. > I've started tearing this apart piece by piece and will put up my finished > notes when I return from holidays. > > A mainstream build method suitable for a project like LFS needs to be > simple, clean, robust and (sorry to be blunt) reasonably idiot-proof. > You fail on all counts IMNSHO.
Merry Christmas and/or winter solstice to you too Greg. What you say is a reasonable opinion. The way you say it comes across as stroking your own ego. The only person you are really putting down is yourself. Unfortunately, that makes many tend to disregard some valuable input. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
