Jim Gifford wrote: > It seems now that LFS is ready to go into the world that CLFS has been > in for a while. There seems to be a lot of discussions, that are going > to be a duplication of work, and no one from LFS reaching out to the > CLFS team for input on what issues we have seen and what you will cross.
Thinking on this some, and reading through old posts, I came across this one from Craig Jackson: http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-July/059585.html I think Craig made some valid points which are still valid now, perhaps even more so, given that man-power/activity in LFS and all its related projects is low these days. It's picking up somewhat, but it's still low. From a brief conversation with Joe Ciccone not too long ago, I gather CLFS is in a similar boat. Can we resolve any actual differences between the projects (and individuals making up the projects) and put aside any perceived disputes and work together in a more unified manner again? If so, what are we willing to do to be more unified? What possibilities are there? -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
