Randy McMurchy wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: > >> #define RELEASE "stable" >> -#define VERSION "2.8" >> +#define VERSION "2.8-20080929-LFS" >> [snip] >> Is there any interest in doing something like this ? > > I like it except the -LFS. As we don't modify it one bit, why > add the LFS? It is a stock weekly tarball unmodified. I don't > think LFS is appropriate. JMHO.
It would be useful to identify the distro. This could easily be done in a sed. I like 2.8-20080929-for_LFS -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
