Bryan Kadzban wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> To me, 2.6.9 is ancient history! (4 years old). I think something >> like 2.6.16 (purely because it is still getting long-term support >> updates) is a better minimum, but also I think we should encourage >> people to build a new kernel first (if they aren't using a Live CD) >> so that they can be sure it works with their .config, and then they >> can use --enable-kernel=current. > > Hmm. I wouldn't want to set it any higher than the minimum required on > the host, which I believe is determined currently by the process to > generate udev NIC names? Though the actual page only says "2.6.x", hmm. > > I *think* the udev process required 2.6.8 or newer to work at all, and > 2.6.18 for some kind of enhancement (comments perhaps?). I wonder if we > need to set it at least that high.
Perhaps I'm not understanding your point. Certainly --enable-kernel=current would cover that very circumstance? -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
