Chris Staub wrote: > Bryan Kadzban wrote: >> >> I'd prefer to get rid of it. It wasn't there at all (since 2007 or so) >> until gcc's extra bits added it as a requirement... > > You mean, don't put m4 in /tools at all, and just build it right before > GMP in Chapter 6? Sounds like that could work...
I think the reason why this isn't preferable is because we want as many packages as possible built with our final gcc. Once in /tools and once in chapter 6 isn't that bad for such a small package. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
