----- Original Message ----- From: "Valter Douglas Lisbôa Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "LFS Developers Mailinglist" <lfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:05 PM Subject: Re: Udev Rules
> > > > Matthew Burgess wrote: > > > >> I'd prefer to follow upstream and put the Udev supplied default rules > > > >> in /lib/udev/rules.d. > > > > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > > I say keep them in /etc. > I'm too. Place of rules is not only a matter of taste between /etc and /lib http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=121828444204300&w=2 If you place everything on /etc, there is no more a priority at one place for custom changes. > > udev maintainer claim > > "Most udev rules are not config files, not supposed to be edited, and > > therefore do not belong into /etc." > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=121839763301840&w=2 > > > > > > Gilles > Well, than it couldn't be editable by a config file, correct?. At least, > the "defaults" for the basic devices must to be resonable, and we all make > ours "udev-configs packages" to create a secure and organized /dev because > these defaults are somewhat insecure or/and ugly. > > I always believe that /lib and /usr/lib are place to store modules, libraries, > binary data and support programs, not plain configurarion texts. Be it for > create defaults or not. > placing rules on /etc is discouraged like editing _default_ rules http://marc.info/?l=linux-hotplug&m=121846825230235&w=2 Gilles -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
