Greg Schafer wrote: > This Perl version includes s static version of Zlib. Better to link > against the system Zlib? I think so.
I would as well had I known. Thanks for the tip. I'll look into it. > The above post also refers to a test failure in the Syslog module. You're > not seeing that? Not sure why you're seeing it. In fact I had 0 (zero) failures on my testsuite run. :-) ext/Sys/Syslog/t/00-load......................................ok ext/Sys/Syslog/t/constants....................................ok ext/Sys/Syslog/t/syslog.......................................ok See below for more about the testsuite. >> +<screen><userinput remap="pre">patch -Np1 -i >> ../&perl-page-patch;</userinput></screen> >> + >> <para>Fix an incompatibility with gcc-&gcc-version;:</para> > > Umm, that patch was only needed for perl-5.8.x, not 5.10.x And it was due > to kernel headers, not GCC. Good to know. Thanks, Greg. >> -<screen><userinput remap="test">make test</userinput></screen> >> +<screen><userinput remap="test">make -k test || true</userinput></screen> > > Ah, that explains why no test failure :-( Not good when the fix is known, > committed upstream and available. I'm interested in what fails. I suppose I'll need to look at the URL you posted, as I said I didn't have any failures. I left the syntax as DJ had it simply because it didn't dawn on me that it wasn't required. Thanks for your interest in our development and especially your comments. It is very nice of you to be helping out like this. -- Randy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
