Gerard Beekmans wrote: > This continues the emails Alexander sent a while back (March 5). > > Alexander, am I correct in my assumption that you would consider RPM a > good choice and DEB a bad choice for LFS purposes.
Yes. Note that I have not evaluated pacman. > Your emails made it sound (to me) that deb would be a lot harder to > implement, maintain and understand (config file wise ie debian/rules > files). RPM, on the other hand, sounds a lot simpler to implement and > maintain as far as you are concerned. What's even more important for educational purposes, Debian rules are incoherent between various Debian packages. -- Alexander E. Patrakov -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
