Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> In conjunction with some of Alexander's proposals I would like to makes some 
> changes.
> 
> Does anyone object if I move section 4.5 (About SBUs) to right after section 
> iv 
> (Host System Requirements).
> 
> I also want to rename the SBU section to "Time to Build an LFS System".  And 
> add 
> some discussion about the overall time to build.

Let's wait a bit for alternative proposals on renaming. It would be nice if 
memory requirements are also covered. Also, why it is placed after the "Host 
System Requirements" section and not before (not an objection, just curious)?

>  I will suggest that ALFS can 
> build a system in about two hours on a reasonably fast system, but ALFS is 
> not 
> recommended for first time LFS users.

AFAIK, ALFS is not an active project (9 mails to the list and 0 SVN commits 
since January, 1st). So it would be better to say something like "a scripted 
build" (meaning user-written scripts) instead of "ALFS", and proide some 
concrete specs of a "reasonably fast system".

-- 
Alexander E. Patrakov
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to