On Nov 26, 2007 10:53 PM, Greg Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (dredging up an old thread) > > Dan Nicholson wrote: > > On 3/19/07, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> So, it seems this difference is embedded in cc1 and can't be stripped > >> out after the build. I'm assuming that the original difference is just > >> debugging symbols like would normally be the case. I'll try to narrow > >> that down further, but this may be a false positive ICA regression. > > > > I took a look at the diff of the `objdump -s' output from the > > unstripped cc1-dummy in each iteration. All the differences were in > > the .debug sections, so I think I can say that the difference in cc1 > > and cc1plus can be ignored as a result of the embedded checksum. I > > still don't know why this isn't the case in DIY. > > It's because I build GCC like this: > > make LDFLAGS=$LDFLAGS > > with LDFLAGS="-s" > > I just hit this diff when ICA-verifying the new build method I'm working > on where I'd ripped out the LDFLAGS. Back in they go...
Yeah, I figured that part out later. It really doesn't matter, but for the purposes of ICA it's good to keep these things out. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
