> I'm doubting the popularity of a linux-2.4/linuxthreads book. Even though it > would be more stable, I don't think anyone would actually use it in real > life. So as an alternative/compromise, how about ditching the 2.4-branch and > make pre-release branches (like 0.1)? Each pre-release would showcase > something new, which is stabilized while adding the next something-new in the > unstable branch. > > For example, copy unstable/ to pre-stable branch/, remove what doesn't work > 100%, and keep the rest. This would mean the pre-stable book should always > work, while unstable may be broken and untested. > > robert
Yeah that would be a nice idea. I was already beginning to think weather "hardened" translates to "unstable".. well my hlfs build is stable enough to run an smtp server 24/7.. thanks. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/hlfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
