On 10/5/07, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We never really decided on what to do for -mtune on Glibc. See the end of > Greg's post here: > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060338.html > > And again his comments here: > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-dev/2007-September/060338.html > > My opinion is that we'd want to use -mtune=native, but I'd like to hear some > feedback from the rest of you.
I think adding -mtune=native will be fine so long as there are no test regressions. Otherwise, Greg's suggestion of -mtune=generic seems very safe. Like Bruce said, I think it needs to be made clear that these additions for glibc are only to clear the i386 hurdle and restore a sane level of CPU tuning. They aren't just random optimizations. I don't think the Ch. 6 Intro needs to be changed as long as the glibc page is clear. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
