I wrote:
> Greg Schafer wrote:
>   
>> Mission - identify the fix, backport patch to 2.17, voila - problem
>> solved! No need for ridiculously flippant declarations of build methods
>> not working and being insufficient? Yes?
>>   
>>     
>
> Not sure that it is possible. Reason: binutils-2.17.50.0.2 don't support 
> --hash-style=both and fail linking to Debian's glibc, while 
> binutils-2.17.50.0.3 support --hash-style=both and work. So a "bugfix" 
> is very likely to be just the addition of the GNU hash support.
>   
Indeed, the 2006-07-11 CVS checkout (timezone is Asia/Yekaterinburg) 
doesn't have GNU hash support and can't link anything against Debian's 
glibc, while 2006-07-12 works. The only difference between them is the 
addition of GNU hash.

Thus, a general solution should be created to the "ld doesn't like host 
glibc" type of problem, as opposed to the gnuhash-specific issue.

-- 
Alexander E. Patrakov
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to