On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:15:56AM +1000, Greg Schafer wrote: > FWIW, If I were to design a pseudo-native build method based on cross > compilation that is exactly how I'd attempt to do it.
Two questions: 1. Do you think it likely that the second pass of GCC in such a build would bootstrap okay? 2. Is there any technical reason why a bootstrap of GCC in pass1 is now more favorable than the second pass? Or is it just a confidence builder early in the game? I could be wrong, but it seems to me that a bootstrap of the second pass when it is linking against our new temporary Glibc would be more revealing as to the sanity of our temporary tools and that everything was moving along as it should. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
