Andrew Beverley wrote: > I've created an ipv4-alias script, please see attached. However, it > is almost exactly the same as the ipv4-static script (it still needs > all the same parameters as a normal static address), which makes me > think that the ipv4-static script should just be updated so that it > can deal with an ALIAS variable (similar to the script Rabenkind > did).
Would there be any problem with doing an: ip addr add <addr>/<prefix> dev eth0 (or equivalent) and dispensing with the aliased interface name? If so, it may be simpler to just add a second config file (with the same ipv4-static SERVICE) to the ifconfig.eth0 directory; then you wouldn't need a new service script. :-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
