* TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20070419 20:12]: > I don't really want to prolong this as an argument, Felix, but technical > is only one domain of interest here. PRACTICAL is the interesting > aspect. Greylisting works.
Partly, at best. The majority of spam I see here is already sent twice. Guess why. > From the perspective of the recipient of > email, there is no cost. All the cost is in the transmission of the > email to the recipient - WHO DID NOT REQUEST IT. QED. This is just brain-dead. If you don't want to receive mail, don't run a mail-server. The cost for greylisting doesn't hit (in most cases) the sender of the mail but some third-party servers. Of course this doesn't bother /you/, but this is antisocial behaviour. Regards, Felix -- Felix M. Palmen (Zirias) \ -PGP- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /"\ ASCII Ribbon web: http://zirias.ath.cx/ \ http://zirias.ath.cx/pub.txt \ / Campaign my open source projects: \ FP ED9B 62D0 BE39 32F9 2488 X Against HTML In http://zirias.ath.cx/?pg=pro \ 5D0C 8177 9D80 5ECF F683 / \ Mail And News
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
