Randy McMurchy wrote:
> As I think about this I'm wondering if you can't maintain a list
> of the BLFS svn packages on the master server, and then compare
> that to the general.ent file in the XML. Unless I'm mistaken, the
> general.ent file contains all the current versions of all the
> packages.
Hmm, that is actually not a bad idea.  general.ent has some extra stuff 
in it (I think) but the file would need massaging to directly test 
versions anyways.  Thanks for that, I'll give that a shot.

And yes, I'm lame, I missed a bunch more packages.  I went through all 
of gnome and checked each one.  Updated:

    ./gnome-speech/gnome-speech-0.4.2.tar.bz2
    ./file-roller/file-roller-2.14.4.tar.bz2
    ./nautilus-cd-burner/nautilus-cd-burner-2.14.3.tar.bz2
    ./gcalctool/gcalctool-5.8.19.tar.bz2
    ./gnome-screensaver/gnome-screensaver-2.14.3.tar.bz2
    ./gedit/gedit-2.14.4.tar.bz2
    ./gnome-system-monitor/gnome-system-monitor-2.14.5.tar.bz2
    ./zenity/zenity-2.14.3.tar.bz2
    ./totem/totem-1.4.3.tar.bz2
    ./eog/eog-2.14.3.tar.bz2
    ./gnopernicus/gnopernicus-1.1.1.tar.bz2
    ./gnome-mag/gnome-mag-0.12.6.tar.bz2
    ./gdm/gdm-2.14.10.tar.bz2

Any others, let me know.

Justin
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to