Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 12/07/06 12:26 CST: > > If, as it appears, the versions we install in LFS are causing you folks in > BLFS headaches, I'd prefer to just let you install the version(s) you > require rather than force the latest version on you resulting in either of > us having to track regressions.
You are a bit confused, Matt. Nobody from BLFS said anything about headaches. :-) BLFS (at the moment) works just fine with the most recent versions of the Autotools. And, by the way, numerous discussions have resulted in the Autotools belonging in LFS. However, any discussions at this point (even if they happen to be redundant to past discussions) are probably good right now, just to stimulate activity within the project. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:36:00 up 3 days, 19:56, 1 user, load average: 0.13, 0.07, 0.07 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
