Ken Moffat wrote:
More on-topic for this list, x86 now has two reports of successful builds. Maybe LFS should reclaim its 'bleeding edge' position and switch to the 2.6.18 headers as soon as the new kernel is out, then let people here and in BLFS find out if anything is broken in use ?
That's the approach I was going to propose too. Unless folks really start (ab)using this new header_install target, upstream (both kernel and userspace packages) are going to remain broken. Let's help these guys out. After all, it'll make our lives easier in the future by not requiring any patches at all :-)
Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
