Dennis J Perkins wrote: > > Maybe replacing sysvinit with runit (?) or something similar for faster > booting? Might be better as a hint or BLFS, altho I would prefer having > a choice of packages when sysvinit is installed. That would probably > cause problems with the bootscripts tho. > > Tape my mouth shut if I'm wrong here but this would probably be a good thing to put in the wiki. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Dan Nicholson
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) M.Canales.es
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Peter Ennis
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Thomas Trepl
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Matthew Burgess
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Thomas Trepl
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Richard Downing
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Matthew Burgess
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Dennis J Perkins
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Joe Ciccone
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Jim Gifford
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Zachary Kotlarek
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Bruce Dubbs
- RE: Dead Project? (I hope not) Reece Dunn
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Ken Moffat
- RE: Dead Project? (I hope not) Reece Dunn
- Re: Dead Project? (I hope not) Craig Jackson