Matthew Burgess wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote:
A similar note is in 6.2, but points to our package mirror instead, so I
don't think anything needs to be done, to be honest.
The package mirrors will be much more up to date now that I finally got
my dsl fixed! Hooray! I personally would have left the package mirrors
in for lfs development, so that people would be more aware of the
mirrors and one can download from a local mirror, but it isn't my book.
;) That said, I'll be updating packages now so the mirrors will have
shadow-4.0.17 in a few. As for 6.2, the packages will be on the ftp
mirrors for a _long_ time, since even 6.0 is still there, so no need for
errata.
hops:justin ~ $ find /srv/ftp/pub/lfs -name shadow* -type f
/srv/ftp/pub/lfs/conglomeration/shadow/shadow-4.0.14-uClibc-1.patch
/srv/ftp/pub/lfs/conglomeration/shadow/shadow-4.0.4.1.tar.bz2
/srv/ftp/pub/lfs/conglomeration/shadow/shadow-4.0.9.tar.bz2
/srv/ftp/pub/lfs/conglomeration/shadow/shadow-4.0.15.tar.bz2
/srv/ftp/pub/lfs/conglomeration/shadow/shadow-4.0.14.tar.bz2
Justin
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
