Matthew Burgess wrote these words on 08/06/06 16:16 CST: > A recent article on lwn.net discussing LFS > (http://lwn.net/Articles/192904/) attracted the following comment: > > "...it's worrying the number of little patches that the LFS instructions > say need applying to the upstream source: why aren't they included > upstream already?"
I'd like to see what they say about Redhat Fedora. They use patches on almost *every* package. Perhaps my meaning is skewed, however, as I mostly look at the Fedora packages that have to do with BLFS. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 22:29:00 up 4 days, 23:57, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.06 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
