Matthew Burgess wrote: > Yep, I think #1765 (update LFS license) can be retargetted as it's not a > show-stopper and needs to be done properly so will take time. The > current license has served us well enough so far, I think.
I would really like to get this into 6.2 so the BLFS and LFS books use the same license. I did submit a patch that fixes the book. The only thing that takes time is the decision to do it. We've been sitting on our collective hands on this for over two months. How long does it take to make the decision? -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
