> Point 2: I dislike /usr on network for completely unrelated reason.
> Suppose that you have several machines that share one /usr from network.
<Snip good advice>
I agree with the above completely, however, you forgot about SANs where
/usr isn't shared. Granted, I have not put LFS on an enterprise server
(Yet!), not to mention that they are usually accessed through dedicated
interfaces, provided by the vendor (at least in my limited experience).
I believe that we should continue to support remote /usr as long as the
changes necessary are manageable.
We can still move towards having a network mountable /usr, even though
it is not officially supported. It will give us the freedom to decide
how far we should go.
--
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
------
nathan at linuxfromscratch org
conathan at gmail com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
