> Bryan Kadzban wrote: > > So then, if glibc installs everything like this, why do we need any > kernel headers at all? Is it just for glibc (and stuff like util-linux > that's Linux specific)? Hmm.
Yes, LKML folks appear to agree that the kernel headers are just for the C library (be it glibc, uclibc or whatever) and a very small number of Linux specific packages. See http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0604.3/1404.html, the last paragraph in particular. Regards, Matt. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
