* Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-20 19:02]: > Now for the philosophical debate of which book should do what with udev > rules. The 2 forerunners in the debate are: > > - The existence of devices comes mainly from the kernel, so everything > should be in LFS. > > - Many devices are unusable without BLFS software, so the rules for > those devices should be in BLFS.
I support your proposal as presented. I think all or most rules should be set in LFS. Besides your reasons, I'll add these to the debate: - there is a precedent for dealing with devices in LFS: the old MAKEDEV script - At some point ease of use might enter the picture. Having all rules set in one place at one time eases system setup considerably. -- Miguel Bazdresch http://thewizardstower.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
