El Viernes, 14 de Abril de 2006 16:14, Dan Nicholson escribió: > Fine work as usual, Chris. Anyway, I think the appendix looks great, > and I'd prefer to have the deps pulled from the individual pages. > With the info just in the appendix, you can flesh it out to useful > lengths. What's on the pages now doesn't add much.
If decided that dependencies info will be removed from packages files and placed only into that new appendix, then the XML tagging for that appendix can be simplified a lot, or to change it to use a diferent type of list, or to use table format or elsewhere. Say to me if you need a new Appendix C template. -- Manuel Canales Esparcia Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
