Archaic wrote these words on 04/13/06 13:02 CST: > And just my 2 cents: > > 1) GDBM is perfectly valid (and maybe preferred?) for this purpose,
This may be true, however, the community determined via discussion that BDB would be what was installed in the LFS book. The new phrasing effectively makes either/or DB package a non-deviation and breaks BLFS. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 13:09:00 up 19 days, 46 min, 2 users, load average: 0.57, 0.66, 0.46 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
